IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injmfa/v11y2019i3-4p238-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting affect the value relevance of accounting information? Empirical evidence from Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Loprevite
  • Daniela Rupo
  • Bruno Ricca

Abstract

This study verifies whether the voluntary adoption of an integrated report in Europe under the framework is associated with the value relevance of summary accounting information. We compare a sample of European listed companies that publish Integrated Reports (IR-firms) under the framework with companies that do not publish it (NIR-firms). To analyse the association between market value (MV) and traditional accounting information (book value and earnings), we use multivariate regression linear models and generalised linear models (GLM). The results of our analysis show that the adoption of IR appears to strongly affect the value relevance of summary accounting information. For IR-firms, we find significant lower value relevance for earnings and slightly higher value relevance for book value, compared to NIR-firms. Additionally, our findings reveal that for both groups the level of investments on intangibles is positively associated to market value but with a significantly higher association for the IR-firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Loprevite & Daniela Rupo & Bruno Ricca, 2019. "Does the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting affect the value relevance of accounting information? Empirical evidence from Europe," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3/4), pages 238-268.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:11:y:2019:i:3/4:p:238-268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salvatore Loprevite & Domenico Raucci & Daniela Rupo, 2020. "KPIs Reporting and Financial Performance in the Transition to Mandatory Disclosure: The Case of Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 997-1061, September.
    3. Daniela Rupo & Nicola Rappazzo & Salvatore Loprevite & Giovanna Centorrino, 2024. "Does non-financial information matter? Mapping and clustering literature on the value relevance of comprehensive disclosure," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2024(2), pages 89-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injmfa:v:11:y:2019:i:3/4:p:238-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=252 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.