IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injdan/v5y2013i1p101-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining the priority rankings of DEA and AHP methodologies: a case study on an ICT industry

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanouil Stiakakis
  • Angelo Sifaleras

Abstract

This article presents a case study on how data envelopment analysis (DEA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) could be combined to produce priority rankings for a set of companies. The shortcomings of each method, when exclusively used to deal with multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problems, are also analysed. The dataset of this study, arising from the European Union (EU) Industrial R%D Investment Scoreboard (European Commission, 2009), consists of the top EU companies activating in the telecommunications equipment industry, which is one of the most representative information and communications technology (ICT) industries. Five criteria, namely, R%D investment, number of employees, capital expenditure, net sales, and operating profit, are used for defining priority rankings of these companies. The application of the case study indicates that the super-efficiency DEA model could be employed for ranking the companies at an initial stage; following that, ranking of the efficient companies could be attained through AHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanouil Stiakakis & Angelo Sifaleras, 2013. "Combining the priority rankings of DEA and AHP methodologies: a case study on an ICT industry," International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 101-114.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:101-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyoungsun Lee & Yuri Park & Daeho Lee, 2016. "Effect of the ICT Ecosystem Structure on the Sustainable Growth of ICT Firms: A Metafrontier Analysis on China, South Korea, the United States, and Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-9, May.
    2. Ghasemi, Mostafa & Dashti, Reza, 2017. "A risk-based model for performance-based regulation of electric distribution companies," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 36-44.
    3. Lee, Kyoungsun & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2018. "Measuring efficiency and ICT ecosystem impact: Hardware vs. software industry," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 107-115.
    4. Hisham Alidrisi & Mehmet Emin Aydin & Abdullah Omer Bafail & Reda Abdulal & Shoukath Ali Karuvatt, 2019. "Monitoring the Performance of Petrochemical Organizations in Saudi Arabia Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injdan:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:101-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=282 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.