IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injbaf/v13y2023i3p341-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goodwill impairment disclosure and integrated reporting: evidence on credit ratings and earnings manipulation

Author

Listed:
  • Athanasios Pavlopoulos
  • George Emmanuel Iatridis

Abstract

This study examines the effect of goodwill impairment disclosure quality and integrated reporting (IR) compliance on earnings manipulation and credit ratings. We assess whether IR and goodwill impairment disclosure quality are associated with managerial behaviour. We find that firms with goodwill impairment are likely to use earnings manipulation and display lower IR compliance and goodwill impairment disclosure quality. We examine the impact of managerial discretion over goodwill impairment on the decision to publish voluntary IR information. We find that companies are likely to voluntarily adopt IR when goodwill impairment is low and goodwill impairment disclosure quality is high. When we broaden our investigation to companies that have already adopted IR, we find that IR compliance is likely to decrease earnings manipulation, increase credit ratings and improve the quality of goodwill impairment disclosure even in the presence of goodwill impairment. Our results highlight the informativeness of IR compliance and support the need for firms to disclose goodwill impairment losses in order to reduce information asymmetry and uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Athanasios Pavlopoulos & George Emmanuel Iatridis, 2023. "Goodwill impairment disclosure and integrated reporting: evidence on credit ratings and earnings manipulation," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 341-387.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:341-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=129339
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:341-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=277 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.