IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injbaf/v12y2021i4p389-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An assessment of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: the capital requirement impact on a stylised financial portfolio

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Pederzoli
  • Costanza Torricelli

Abstract

This paper assesses the impact on capital requirements of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) based on a stylised financial portfolio sensible to the risk factors affected by the review. Our results show the order of magnitude of the increase across the two regulations and the two possible approaches: the standard approach and the internal model approach. We further disentangle the components of the expected increase implied by the FRTB. The most interesting result emerges for the internal model approach, whereby the increase in the capital charge is attributable not only to the change in the risk measure and the inclusion of longer liquidity horizons, but most importantly to the dampening of the diversification benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Pederzoli & Costanza Torricelli, 2021. "An assessment of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: the capital requirement impact on a stylised financial portfolio," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 389-403.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:389-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118588
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:389-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=277 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.