IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injbaf/v12y2021i4p368-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the role and effectiveness of the audit committee on the quality of financial reporting: evidence from Greek PIEs

Author

Listed:
  • Constantinos Chalevas
  • Panagiotis Giannopoulos
  • Andreas Koutoupis
  • Angeliki Samara

Abstract

A new audit law was set in force in Greece in 2017 in accordance with the provisions of the European Regulation 537/2014, which reinforces the role of the audit committee (AC) and introduces new audit requirements. This study investigates the impact of the adoption of the new audit law on the quality of financial reporting. The used variables derived from the major law requirements and were measured appropriately using the responses of audit committees to a structured questionnaire developed to capture the compliance of the entities with the new law provisions. The sample is randomly selected, consists of 138 public interest entities (PIEs) for the year 2018 and concerns firms of various sizes and sectors. Our model contains a set of variables, solely derived from the new audit law. Audit committee composition and skills, its duty to make statutory auditors (or audit firms) understand the business of the entity as long with its responsibility for monitoring the independence of the statutory auditor and the effectiveness of the entity's internal quality control seem to significantly improve the quality of financial reporting.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantinos Chalevas & Panagiotis Giannopoulos & Andreas Koutoupis & Angeliki Samara, 2021. "Evaluating the role and effectiveness of the audit committee on the quality of financial reporting: evidence from Greek PIEs," International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 368-388.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:368-388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118629
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injbaf:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:368-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=277 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.