IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v17y2025i1p1-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A full ranking method in data envelopment analysis with multi-criteria decision analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Madjid Tavana
  • Abbas Bonyani
  • Tooraj Karimi

Abstract

This study presents a new hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) model for the full ranking of Decision-Making Units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The Best-Worst Method (BWM) is used to rank the units, and the Charnes-Cooper-Rhodes (CCR) Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model is utilised to construct the pairwise comparison vector. The unit with the lowest efficiency is identified and compared with other units using DEA for each pair of units. Similarly, the unit with the highest efficiency is identified next and compared with the different units. A linear programming problem is formulated and solved to find the optimal weight of the units and rank them. The pairwise comparisons in the proposed BWM-DEA method are highly consistent because of the objective evaluation process. The proposed method has several advantages, including fewer and more consistent comparisons, leading to more reliable results than similar ranking methods in DEA.

Suggested Citation

  • Madjid Tavana & Abbas Bonyani & Tooraj Karimi, 2025. "A full ranking method in data envelopment analysis with multi-criteria decision analysis," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143653
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.