IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/injams/v16y2024i3p304-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated FAHP and TOPSIS for supplier selection under uncertainty: a case study in electrical explosion protection and sensor company

Author

Listed:
  • Le Thu Trang Nguyen
  • Thi Huyen Trang Nguyen
  • Duc Duy Nguyen

Abstract

Supplier selection plays a vital role in supplier management, which decides the success of the supply chain. This study proposes a supplier selection framework, FAHP-TOPSIS, to overcome the challenges associated with imprecise information in the decision-making process. A list of criteria is initially identified through an extensive literature review and expert interviews. Subsequently, the FAHP technique is employed to determine the weights assigned to each criterion. Following this, the TOPSIS method is applied to rank and select the most suitable alternatives from the pool of potential suppliers. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed supplier selection framework, a practical case study is conducted within the context of electrical explosion protection and sensor companies in Vietnam. A sensitivity analysis is performed to examine the robustness of the criterion weights and ranking of suppliers. The findings consistently demonstrate that product cost and quality consistently rank as the top-priority factors in supplier selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Thu Trang Nguyen & Thi Huyen Trang Nguyen & Duc Duy Nguyen, 2024. "An integrated FAHP and TOPSIS for supplier selection under uncertainty: a case study in electrical explosion protection and sensor company," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 304-328.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:304-328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:injams:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:304-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=286 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.