IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijsusd/v16y2013i1-2p66-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobilising high-quality knowledge through dialogic environmental governance: a comparison of approaches and their institutional settings

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Bremer

Abstract

An increasing tendency to classify environmental issues as 'wicked' has seen a wavering confidence in models of 'resource management' in favour of models of 'environmental governance'. This has come with an attendant shift in epistemological perspectives for the mobilisation of knowledge in support of society's collective deliberation and decision-making, with governance fields increasingly espousing a 'dialogic' approach. Looking through an 'interactive governance' lens, this article reveals a diversity of different forms of dialogue for the mobilisation of knowledge, before focusing on those forms that: a) are inclusive of all knowledge systems; b) bring together knowledge through reciprocal dialogue; c) allow for the negotiation of knowledge quality in terms of 'credibility, salience and legitimacy'. To this end, it unpacks and compares three specific approaches for the dialogic mobilisation of knowledge; deliberative democracy, collaborative learning and post-normal science.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Bremer, 2013. "Mobilising high-quality knowledge through dialogic environmental governance: a comparison of approaches and their institutional settings," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1/2), pages 66-90.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:16:y:2013:i:1/2:p:66-90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53791
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Vogt & Christoph Weber, 2020. "The Role of Universities in a Sustainable Society. Why Value-Free Research is Neither Possible nor Desirable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:16:y:2013:i:1/2:p:66-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=25 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.