IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v19y2025i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key factors of near miss reporting behaviour at work and the interaction of safety climate: a review based on reciprocal safety model

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Hui Tay

Abstract

Near misses share with safety accidents their origin but with no or reduced impact, thus providing organisations with the prediction of workplace accidents without experiencing actual cost and harmful consequences. Despite the effort to make near miss reporting a mandatory requirement, the issue of near miss under-reporting remains. Extant literature examines the key factors of near miss reporting behaviour as independent determinants, without considering the interaction of these factors and, more importantly, the interaction of the reporting behaviour and the safety climate at work. In the reciprocal safety culture model, safety behaviour is found to reciprocate with personal and organisational factors. This paper examines the key factors of near miss reporting and its interaction with safety climate through study review, and discusses the reciprocal relationship of near miss reporting behaviour. The study findings will serve as reference for safety researchers and practitioners for effective near miss management system and training development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Hui Tay, 2025. "Key factors of near miss reporting behaviour at work and the interaction of safety climate: a review based on reciprocal safety model," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 1-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143765
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:19:y:2025:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.