IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v18y2024i4p397-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human-caused accident evaluation of coal mine safety relying on ant colony clustering algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzhe Lai

Abstract

Through the analysis of numerous case samples, it is easy to find that the numerous reasons for the frequent occurrence of coal mine accidents are the human factors, and human-caused accidents have become the main cause of coal mine safety. The causes of human-caused accidents are very complex as well as the characteristic mechanisms of accidents are difficult to extract and carry out accurate data measurement, so the traditional engineering safety measurement methods have great limitations. They cannot accurately evaluate the causes of human-caused accidents in coal mines in the problem of high-dimensional pattern recognition. Based on this, the main work of the study focused on selecting the algorithm with good performance of simulated evolution-ant colony clustering algorithm as the technical support for the evaluation work, combining with the current mine production practice, four categories of factors from individual worker factors, environmental factors, life event factors and biological rhythm factors were clustered and analysed, scientific classification patterns as well as mathematical models were established to quantitatively analyse. The analysis of human misbehaviour is analysed and predicted. A behaviour correction model is established based on the human causes derived from the analysis so as to achieve the effect of accident prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzhe Lai, 2024. "Human-caused accident evaluation of coal mine safety relying on ant colony clustering algorithm," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 397-418.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:397-418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:397-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.