IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v18y2024i4p363-380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating reliability in airport baggage handling: a time-based assessment of the individual carrier system

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuqing Yang
  • Xiaorui Wang
  • Dongfei Zhao
  • Wei He
  • Ting Li

Abstract

The Individual Carrier System (ICS) represents a critical component in airport baggage handling, necessitating rigorous reliability assessments during both its developmental and operational stages. This research introduces an innovative methodology for ICS reliability evaluation centred on baggage transport time. Here, transport time is articulated as an amalgamation of ideal transport time and sequential queuing durations. Building on these foundational models, we have devised a reliability simulation framework that assimilates both deterministic system parameters and stochastic input variables. This integrative approach facilitates the determination of pertinent reliability indices and associated failure probabilities. To underscore the practical implications and robustness of our methodology, we delve into a real-world ICS test system. Our findings illuminate the nuanced interplay between average pallet wait times and total pallet input numbers. Furthermore, we chart the trajectory of the reliability index in relation to initial loading intensities. Such insights bear significant ramifications for both the architectural design of ICS and their operational efficiency within airport environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuqing Yang & Xiaorui Wang & Dongfei Zhao & Wei He & Ting Li, 2024. "Evaluating reliability in airport baggage handling: a time-based assessment of the individual carrier system," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 363-380.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:363-380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142090
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:363-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.