IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v18y2024i4p321-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disclosing harmful patient safety incidents with proactive compensation offer: how do patients respond in Japan?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuzhu Gu
  • Mingming Deng

Abstract

Disclosure of harmful incidents is important as patients have the right to know the truth. This study aims to explore the impacts of partial and full disclosure, alongside proactive compensation offers on Japanese patients' reactions. A questionnaire survey was conducted using two fictitious cases with four types of disclosure scenarios. Participants were asked inquired about the actions they would be inclined to take if they were the ones affected. A total of 543 responses to the moderate and 587 responses to the severe harm case were collected. The findings in this study suggest that similar reactions were observed from Japanese patients after receiving full or partial disclosure. In addition, proactive compensation offers had a mitigation effect on patient complaints complains and lawsuits. Therefore, for Japanese healthcare providers, such evidence could relieve their fear of patients' reactions after full disclosure; and for healthcare organisations, it is recommended that proactive compensation offers be included alongside disclosure programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuzhu Gu & Mingming Deng, 2024. "Disclosing harmful patient safety incidents with proactive compensation offer: how do patients respond in Japan?," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 321-336.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:321-336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:321-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.