IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijrsaf/v17y2023i2p103-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison study for bearing remaining useful life prediction by using standard stochastic approach and digital twin

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Liu
  • Jørn Vatn
  • Viggo Gabriel Borg Pedersen
  • Shen Yin
  • Bahareh Tajiani

Abstract

Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is important for research of maintenance. It is common to use stochastic approaches to predict RUL of components. On the other hand, there is a digital twin model developed by MATLAB for bearing's real-time RUL prediction. To have a better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of these models, an experiment was designed and implemented to get real degradation data of bearings for model testing. Two stochastic approaches are selected which are Wiener process and Geometric Brownian Motion. The purpose of the paper is to compare the models for RUL prediction with standard stochastic approaches and digital twin through real degradation data in order to compare them. Finally, the MATLAB digital twin model outperforms stochastic approaches in the early phases of prediction while remaining comparable in the latter stages. The paper could be used as a reference for further RUL prediction research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Liu & Jørn Vatn & Viggo Gabriel Borg Pedersen & Shen Yin & Bahareh Tajiani, 2023. "A comparison study for bearing remaining useful life prediction by using standard stochastic approach and digital twin," International Journal of Reliability and Safety, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(2), pages 103-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:103-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijrsaf:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:103-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=98 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.