IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v7y2011i1-2-3p40-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deficit reduction policies, market credibility and market failure

Author

Listed:
  • Yiannis Kitromilides

Abstract

The UK coalition government claims that the establishment of market 'credibility' can only be achieved through the implementation of immediate and unpalatable fiscal austerity measures. The paper examines this claim and considers some additional questions. First, is there is any justification for subordinating public policy-making to market sentiment? Do financial markets strengthen or subvert democracies? Are markets 'rational' in the way they define policy 'credibility', or is there a 'market failure'? An example of market failure is the so called 'fallacy of composition' case: if an indebted individual wants to avoid insolvency, adopting personal austerity measures constitutes a 'credible' policy of deficit reduction; the same may not be true for the whole economy. The recent experience with fiscal austerity in Europe suggests that the adoption of rapid fiscal consolidation policies in order to 'appease' the financial markets may in fact be counterproductive.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiannis Kitromilides, 2011. "Deficit reduction policies, market credibility and market failure," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1/2/3), pages 40-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:7:y:2011:i:1/2/3:p:40-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=39574
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:7:y:2011:i:1/2/3:p:40-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.