IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v4y2009i5p414-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From clouds to hailstorms: a policy and administrative science perspective on safeguarding public values in networked infrastructures

Author

Listed:
  • Wijnand Veeneman
  • Willemijn Dicke
  • Mark De Bruijne

Abstract

This paper analyses how public values are achieved in Dutch infrastructures and distinguishes four crucial stages in decision making processes: the advocacy process, the political process, the bureaucratic process and the provision process. An important conclusion of this paper is that the character of public values undergoes significant changes in each of these stages of the decision-making process, generally from more abstract notions to more concrete. With the level of abstraction, the content of the public value also tends to shift from stage to stage. We conclude that a balanced repertoire of safeguarding mechanisms should address the various stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Wijnand Veeneman & Willemijn Dicke & Mark De Bruijne, 2009. "From clouds to hailstorms: a policy and administrative science perspective on safeguarding public values in networked infrastructures," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(5), pages 414-434.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:414-434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=25080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bauke Steenhuisen & Mark de Bruijne, 2016. "How Do Network Companies Seek Legitimacy for Public Value Trade Offs?," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 17(2), pages 181-201, June.
    2. Veeneman, Wijnand & Koppenjan, Joop, 2010. "Securing public values in public transport projects: Four Dutch cases on innovation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 224-230.
    3. Brenda Espinosa Apráez & Saskia Lavrijssen, 2018. "Exploring the regulatory challenges of a possible rollout of smart water meters in the Netherlands," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 19(3-4), pages 159-179, September.
    4. Cuppen, Eefje & Pesch, Udo & Remmerswaal, Sanne & Taanman, Mattijs, 2019. "Normative diversity, conflict and transition: Shale gas in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 165-175.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:4:y:2009:i:5:p:414-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.