IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v3y2008i5-6p430-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing efficiency between public and private hospitals in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Haejong Lee
  • Hewon Lee
  • Keon-Hyung Lee
  • Thomas T.H. Wan

Abstract

Using the 2002 data from 32 Korean hospitals and using a matching method (16 public versus 16 private hospitals), this study compares Financial Efficiency (FE), Technical Efficiency (TE) and Service Efficiency (SE) between public and private hospitals. This research tests three hypotheses. The first hypothesis, that private hospitals will have higher FE than public hospitals is supported by the empirical findings. The second hypothesis, that public hospitals will have higher TE than private hospitals is also supported. The third hypothesis, that private hospitals will have higher levels of SE than public hospitals have, is not supported. Private hospitals have clear organisational goals that lead to higher FE. Public hospitals, in contrast, are less eager to improve FE than to improve TE because they are evaluated based on TE. The quality of services (i.e. SE) provided by public hospitals is indifferent from that of private hospitals. It is important to remember which aspects of efficiency we are dealing with when comparing between public and private hospitals.

Suggested Citation

  • Haejong Lee & Hewon Lee & Keon-Hyung Lee & Thomas T.H. Wan, 2008. "Comparing efficiency between public and private hospitals in South Korea," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(5/6), pages 430-442.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:3:y:2008:i:5/6:p:430-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=20993
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:3:y:2008:i:5/6:p:430-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.