IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v1y2005i1-2p122-147.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional destabilisation and the new public management: the case of tax incremental financing

Author

Listed:
  • Mark A. Covaleski
  • Mark W. Dirsmith
  • Katrina L. Mantzke

Abstract

With the goal of extending the New Public Management perspective by focusing on the play of vested interests and power, our study examines the active agency of a single company contracting with local and state governments to implement a Tax Incremental Financing (TIF) programme. Extending beyond the traditional focus of institutional theory on organisational conformity to institutionalised expectations, our analysis expands upon an emerging strand of research which argues that regulated organisations may manipulate the laws which govern them to serve their own ends. We find that even though the TIF programme was constructed in a relatively concrete manner with very little uncertainty as to its provisions, it was manipulated through strategic action on the part of the company regulated. What proved more interesting, however, was the social process by which stakeholders interpreted, negotiated and grudgingly came to agree on the meaning of this regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark A. Covaleski & Mark W. Dirsmith & Katrina L. Mantzke, 2005. "Institutional destabilisation and the new public management: the case of tax incremental financing," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 122-147.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:1:y:2005:i:1/2:p:122-147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=7799
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ormeño-Pérez, Rodrigo & Oats, Lynne, 2024. "The making of problematic tax regulation: A Bourdieusian perspective," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Mulligan, Emer & Oats, Lynne, 2016. "Tax professionals at work in Silicon Valley," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 63-76.
    3. Svidroňová Mária Murray & Meričková Beáta Mikušová & Gondášová Lýdia, 2016. "E-procurement in Contracting-out of Public Goods and Services: Evidence from Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 57-71, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:1:y:2005:i:1/2:p:122-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.