IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v17y2024i4p267-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A national cybersecurity risk framework model proposal: cybergency management

Author

Listed:
  • Bahadir Sahin
  • Yusuf Emek

Abstract

This article delves into the challenges associated with the prevention of various types of cyberattacks through cybersecurity measures and the associated emergency management regulations within the USA. The central argument posits that conventional emergency management policies and intervention strategies have become obsolete, necessitating the implementation of a multi-faceted approach for the avoidance and mitigation of cyber risks. The article also comprehensively addresses the national risk assessment process, highlighting potential biases arising from methodological assumptions and political resistance towards acknowledging unfavourable outcomes. In order to fortify emergency management strategies, the author advocates for the adoption of a systematic risk assessment procedure, the utilisation of intelligence analytic techniques, and the establishment of explicit legal mandates and designated agencies for risk assessment. Moreover, the study outlines a four-step framework for the concept coined as 'cybergency management', comprising initiatives such as training and education, the creation of a new governing body dedicated to overseeing the field, the establishment of an emergency alert system (EAS) network accessible to all relevant stakeholders, and the continuous evaluation of the cybersecurity infrastructure and potential threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahadir Sahin & Yusuf Emek, 2024. "A national cybersecurity risk framework model proposal: cybergency management," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 267-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:267-283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139795
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:17:y:2024:i:4:p:267-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.