IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v43y2024i3p371-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explanatory hypothesis generation during a root cause analysis: a multiple case study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Barsalou

Abstract

Quality failures can be costly for organisations in terms of actual costs and harm to the organisation's reputation. Every root cause analysis should have an empirical aspect, which can be achieved by directly investigating the failed part and this paper illustrates the value in both experimenting with failed parts and directly investigating failed parts to identify causes, so that effective solutions can be implemented. A multiple case study approach is used in this paper. In one situation, the root cause was only found after multiple cycles of hypothesising and experimenting. In the other situation, a long sought after cause was finally found by investigating a failed part. The two investigations went in different directions, with one requiring multiple cycles of experimentation and the other requiring observation of failed parts. The insights from these investigations can be useful for organisation investigating failures.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Barsalou, 2024. "Explanatory hypothesis generation during a root cause analysis: a multiple case study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 43(3), pages 371-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:371-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142316
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:43:y:2024:i:3:p:371-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.