IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v42y2024i4p422-444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Failure mode and effects analysis: a decision-making risk prioritisation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Maryam Sedighi Shamami
  • Soroush Avakh Darestani
  • Niloufar Hojat Shemami
  • Iniobong Enang

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a method of risk assessment that is broadly utilised to identify, predict as well as mitigate possible defects in products, operations, and systems prior to the occurrence of a negative incident. However, inaccurate results may be generated due to the uncertain conditions under which risk assessment using the FMEA. Therefore, there is need to mitigate the uncertainty, particularly randomness and fuzziness in the assessment process. This can be achieved by using grey numbers to develop the FMEA and VIKOR methods to fix several hindrances related to the risk priority number (RPN) of the traditional FMEA. This paper aims to compare the Grey VIKOR with the traditional FMEA to present more accurate ranking. In the first step, grey system was used to rank failure modes and select risk elements to join vulnerability into subjective judgments. Thereafter, VIKOR method was applied for prioritising and evaluating failure modes. The results of comparative analysis indicate the adequacy and versatility of the proposed method in dealing with real-world issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Maryam Sedighi Shamami & Soroush Avakh Darestani & Niloufar Hojat Shemami & Iniobong Enang, 2024. "Failure mode and effects analysis: a decision-making risk prioritisation approach," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 422-444.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:422-444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140600
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:42:y:2024:i:4:p:422-444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.