IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v3y2008i4p472-495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six Sigma inspired sampling plan design to minimise sample size for inspection

Author

Listed:
  • G. Manikandan
  • SM. Kannan
  • V. Jayabalan

Abstract

One of the important property of the c = 0 plan is that it provides a perception that defective product will not be tolerated, ideally a zero defect environment requirement. But this plan fails in discriminating the lots with non-conformities even with larger sample size. In this paper, a method based on Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) road map Plan, Identify, Design, Optimise and Validate (PIDOV) is proposed for problem solving. This procedure retains the simplicity of single sampling plan by attributes. The procedure uses a recursive form of hypergeometric probability formula for sampling plan design to meet the stipulated consumer's risk and producer's risk. New levels of AQL and LTPD are chosen and corresponding changes in the given specifications are made yielding to smaller sample size. The new tightened specification allows the probability of occurrence of the defective in a smaller size of the sample. The parameter Average Total Inspected (ATI) calculated shows considerable improvements from the existing sampling plans. Thus the proposed procedure shifts the application of acceptance sampling plan to acceptance control plan to ensure minimum deviations from the desired specification mean, an obvious objective of a Six Sigma program.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Manikandan & SM. Kannan & V. Jayabalan, 2008. "Six Sigma inspired sampling plan design to minimise sample size for inspection," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 472-495.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:472-495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=19762
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:3:y:2008:i:4:p:472-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.