IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v2y2007i2p177-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivational aspects of corporate productivity maximisation: a field study

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie P. Monat

Abstract

Over the past 30 years, there have been many proposed approaches to maximising corporate productivity. Most of these require substantial investment in 'productivity improvement programmes' involving new technology, additional capital infrastructure, or process changes such as business process reengineering. A recent theoretical paper suggests that instead of investing in these purported improvements, corporations might be better off investing in revamping their employee goal-behaviour-metric-reward (GBMR) systems, which tie corporate goals to individual goals, articulate desired behaviours for each employee, describe the metrics used to measure performance and establish appropriate rewards to drive desired behaviour. This paper reports the results of a field study in which the productivity of 13 corporations was correlated with the quality of their GBMR systems. A positive correlation was observed, indicating that the GBMR system correlates fairly well with corporate productivity and that focusing on improving a company's GBMR system may be a cost-effective approach to maximising corporate productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie P. Monat, 2007. "Motivational aspects of corporate productivity maximisation: a field study," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 177-192.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:2:y:2007:i:2:p:177-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=12409
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:2:y:2007:i:2:p:177-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.