IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v28y2019i1p90-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of discomfort glare due to artificial indoor lighting

Author

Listed:
  • Deevesh Sharma
  • Awadhesh Bhardwaj
  • Monica Sharma
  • Ashraf Mirza

Abstract

The research evaluated the effect of the change in position of the observer and luminance of light source on discomfort glare. There were two approaches taken in this study, one was qualitative and other was quantitative approach. The quantitative approach was based on unified glare rating. In this study, 11 experiments have been conducted to get degree of glare at different places of room. The qualitative analysis performed over 15 participants and on the basis of questionnaire, degree of glare has been evaluated. A participant has to answer that he finds particular field of direction comfortable or not by marking it on a scale (De-Boer) of 1-4. The result obtained from both approaches was compared to get the comfortable range of illuminance and the angle between the luminaire with line of sight.

Suggested Citation

  • Deevesh Sharma & Awadhesh Bhardwaj & Monica Sharma & Ashraf Mirza, 2019. "Qualitative and quantitative analysis of discomfort glare due to artificial indoor lighting," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(1), pages 90-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:90-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=102425
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:28:y:2019:i:1:p:90-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.