IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v25y2018i2p262-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deployment of operational performance indicators in failure mode effect and analysis application: a literature review and classification

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Fung Liew
  • Joshua Prakash
  • Kok Seng Ong

Abstract

Failure mode effect and analysis (FMEA) is a well-known methodology for improving operational performance, such as the quality, cost, and delivery time of a product, process, or system. However, the success of FMEA in operational performance cannot be quantified at present. The risk priority number (RPN), which is the only indicator of FMEA, has no relationship with operational performance. For example, a reduction in RPN may not benefit operational performance, particularly if the corrective action is to enhance detection. Thus, the capability of FMEA to improve operational performance cannot be validated unless it demonstrates quantifiable operational performance. An organisation is distinct from its competitors based on its operational performance and not based on RPN. The missing operational performance measurement practice in FMEA is essential for further strengthening the FMEA methodology. This study aims to identify the most effective methodology and approach for quantifying the success of FMEA in operational performance through a systematic review and to classify FMEA articles that measured operational performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Fung Liew & Joshua Prakash & Kok Seng Ong, 2018. "Deployment of operational performance indicators in failure mode effect and analysis application: a literature review and classification," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(2), pages 262-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:25:y:2018:i:2:p:262-283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=94770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:25:y:2018:i:2:p:262-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.