IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v19y2016i4p423-445.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying and prioritising of KPIs based on BSC by multi-criteria decision making - the case of the Central Post Office of Isfahan

Author

Listed:
  • Somaye Sharifi
  • Hadi Shirouyehzad
  • Ali Nasr Esfahani

Abstract

Success and survival of each organisation depends on its performance, so organisation performance measurement is very important. Performance evaluation helps the organisation with the identification and removing the weaknesses. We need a specific criterion and indicator to assess the performance. KPIs are indicators which focus on the success of organisation. This study is done to identify and rank KPIs based on BSC by MCDM in Isfahan Central Post Office. Afterwards, the ranked indicators have been analysed by their sensitivity. As a result, quality of service and work is respectively the most important indicator in the organisation. The result of the sensitivity analysis of the ranked criteria also shows that the most important criterion is financial perspective. Finally, considering the level of the importance of performance evaluation in each organisation and the important role of KPIs in its measurement, organisations can use this procedure to get optimum performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Somaye Sharifi & Hadi Shirouyehzad & Ali Nasr Esfahani, 2016. "Identifying and prioritising of KPIs based on BSC by multi-criteria decision making - the case of the Central Post Office of Isfahan," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(4), pages 423-445.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:423-445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=80151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:19:y:2016:i:4:p:423-445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.