IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v19y2016i3p277-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation level among the observations for a pharmaceutical industry using X chart with economics

Author

Listed:
  • D.R. Prajapati

Abstract

Traditionally, it is assumed that the observations are independent and identically distributed (IID). However, in actual practice, the observations may be correlated. The paper presents the new X chart; based on sum of chi-squares theory and designed to counter the autocorrelation. Optimal schemes of new X chart for sample size (n) of four at different levels of correlation (Φ) are presented in this paper. Samples of quantity (in ml.) of the syrup are taken from a pharmaceutical industry; located in India and the level of correlation among the observations is calculated. The levels of correlation among the observations of the quantity of the syrup are computed and matched with the suggested optimal schemes of new X chart for sample size (n) of four. It is found that the level of correlation of 0.50 exists among the data of the industry. The economic performance of the new X chart is also measured in terms of the expected cost (EC) per hour for the given set of parameters. The EC per hour is calculated for the shifts in the process mean. It is observed that the new X chart for sample size of four is more economical than Shewhart X chart to use in the industries where autocorrelation exists.

Suggested Citation

  • D.R. Prajapati, 2016. "Correlation level among the observations for a pharmaceutical industry using X chart with economics," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 277-300.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:277-300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79777
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:19:y:2016:i:3:p:277-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.