IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v12y2013i2p161-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the selection of significant variables from unreplicated factorial designs

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno Ricardo Costa
  • José Palma
  • Zulema Lopes Pereira

Abstract

Separation of the few control factors with significant effect from the remaining ones at the early phase of experimental studies is a recommended practice for systems development and improvement. The normal probability plot is a widely accepted graphical technique for screening, although it does not provide a unique interpretation of results in some cases. Thus, more formal procedures have been proposed to supplement it. The performance of popular methods along with lesser known and used ones is assessed using four evaluation standards based on a simulation study. The results show that Al-Shiha and Yang's method stands out as the best performer when compared with other computational methods so it is the best choice to supplement the often used graphical technique. A strategy for analysing unreplicated fractional factorial designs is also outlined.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno Ricardo Costa & José Palma & Zulema Lopes Pereira, 2013. "On the selection of significant variables from unreplicated factorial designs," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 161-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:161-184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuno Costa & Paulo Fontes, 2020. "Energy-Efficiency Assessment and Improvement—Experiments and Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:12:y:2013:i:2:p:161-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.