IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v7y2015i3p236-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Atypical perspectives on project management: moving beyond the rational, to the political and the psychosocial

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Saint-Macary
  • Lavagnon A. Ika

Abstract

In the main, project management subscribes to an objective view of the organisation, relatively free of political and psychosocial tensions. But, this may be misleading in the context of projects where the stakes are numerous and complex. The article views the project from three perspectives: the conventional rational perspective, with the prism of the mandate; the atypical political perspective, with the prism of the principals; and the atypical psychosocial perspective, with the prism of the agents. It emerges that the rational perspective may be sufficient to assess and manage a project when efficiency prevails in both the parent and the client organisations. However, the project manager would be better served to use an integrative approach that also includes the political perspective when the organisations involved have differing expectations regarding the project, as well as the psychosocial perspective when project team members have a great deal of autonomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Saint-Macary & Lavagnon A. Ika, 2015. "Atypical perspectives on project management: moving beyond the rational, to the political and the psychosocial," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 236-250.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:236-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70791
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kosztyán, Zsolt T. & Katona, Attila I. & Kuppens, Kurt & Kisgyörgy-Pál, Mária & Nachbagauer, Andreas & Csizmadia, Tibor, 2022. "Exploring the structures and design effects of EU-funded R&D&I project portfolios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:236-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.