IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v3y2011i1p57-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relations intra- and inter-organisations for the study of the temporary multi-organisation in construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalo Lizarralde
  • Michel De Blois
  • Colin Davidson

Abstract

Construction projects are carried out by a temporary team of heterogeneous organisations called a 'temporary multi-organisation' (TMO). TMOs are constituted by procurement strategies on the part of the project client which emphasise the inter-organisation relations but which put little emphasis on the impact of internal, i.e., intra-organisational, structures, including those of the client. These procurement strategies mostly concern the contractual arrangements between the client and contractors and/or professionals. However, they do not specifically allow for anticipating the impact the participants' internal structures and relationships might have on these contractual arrangements. This article examines how the mechanisms of coordination inter- and intra-organisations influence the TMO. The research is based on the in-depth analysis of nine projects and of three institutional clients in Canada. Research findings show that formal and informal relations between project participants do not necessarily follow the legally binding procurement strategies. The findings permit identifying common patterns regarding the importance of intra-organisation relations within institutional clients, and between them and the participants of the construction industry. The patterns suggest four representative configurations of the TMO.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalo Lizarralde & Michel De Blois & Colin Davidson, 2011. "Relations intra- and inter-organisations for the study of the temporary multi-organisation in construction projects," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 57-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:57-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38864
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gonzalo Lizarralde & Stella Tomiyoshi & Mario Bourgault & Juan Malo & Georgia Cardosi, 2013. "Understanding differences in construction project governance between developed and developing countries," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 711-730, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:3:y:2011:i:1:p:57-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.