IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v1y2009i3p268-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The roles and risks of incentives in construction projects

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kadefors
  • Ulrika Badenfelt

Abstract

In construction projects, financial incentives such as target cost arrangements are often considered essential to create joint goals and support collaboration, especially in partnering relationships. Still, research has shown that many incentive schemes are limited and inconsistent and that management is often lacking in rigour. A starting point for this paper is that a wider framework of the roles and effects is needed to understand practitioner strategies for the design and management of financial incentives. Based on the literature on motivation and trust and an interview survey with Swedish clients and contractors, we identify three roles of financial incentives in interorganisational relationships: sources of extrinsic motivation, symbols of trust and efficiency and generators of communication processes. Symbolic roles are primarily related to the expectations and perceptions of trust and efficiency in the early stages, while process aspects influence the development of constructive collaboration as the relationship unfolds. Four client strategies are described, differing in the degree of elaboration and relational orientation, and we conclude that both practitioners and researchers need to consider all three incentive roles to understand the full range of effects of a particular strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kadefors & Ulrika Badenfelt, 2009. "The roles and risks of incentives in construction projects," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(3), pages 268-284.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:268-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27539
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:268-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.