IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v16y2024i4p424-447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating methodologies-in-action: a cognitive approach

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Drake
  • Ravi Paul

Abstract

Organisations' information systems development methodologies (ISDM) vary in how they implement best practices, often creating their own methodology-in-action. These variations in ISDM practices sometimes improve the decision making throughout the process and sometimes hinder the decision making. However, we lack clarity on how to evaluate methodologies-in-action based on the cognitive bias or lack thereof, in the embedded practices. Building off of theory in ISDM debiasing and pedagogical debiasing, we propose an evaluative technique that analyses the practices of a methodologies-in-action at the project level. Proof of concept that the technique works is provided in a case study within a methodology-in-action at a Fortune 500 firm.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Drake & Ravi Paul, 2024. "Evaluating methodologies-in-action: a cognitive approach," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 424-447.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:424-447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=143178
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:424-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.