IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v16y2024i3p309-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A collaborative delivery model with multi-party contract for industrial engineering projects

Author

Listed:
  • Tommi Pauna
  • Jaakko Kujala
  • Kirsi Aaltonen

Abstract

Industrial engineering projects are temporary, engineering- and technology-intensive capital projects of usually private sector investors. These projects require the integration of knowledge and competencies from various actors as well as effective interorganisational collaboration. However, in practice, the integration of knowledge and competencies and achieving comprehensive collaboration are challenging because of the absence of working models and guidelines for contractual arrangements in this context. To address this, action design research was applied, and a new collaborative delivery model called the engineering, procurement, and construction alliancing (EPCA) model was developed together with project practitioners. The EPCA delivery model engages key actors early on to identify joint themes and issues that benefit from collaboration and manage them through jointly defined risk and reward sharing structures. This paper identifies how multi-party arrangements with collaborative practices can be used and the key issues that should be addressed through collaborative arrangements in industrial engineering projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommi Pauna & Jaakko Kujala & Kirsi Aaltonen, 2024. "A collaborative delivery model with multi-party contract for industrial engineering projects," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 309-341.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:309-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140412
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:3:p:309-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.