IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v16y2024i2p185-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating and prioritising decision-making factors in construction project management to select the best constructor

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Gheibdoust
  • Shahram Gilaninia
  • Mohammad Taleghani

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate and prioritise the decision-making factors in construction project management to select the best constructor. The step-by-step weight ratio analysis (SWARA) method was used to prioritise the decision-making factors of construction project management to select the best contractors in Rasht City Municipality, Iran. Ten experts participated in this research to make decisions with the SWARA, and data were collected in 2022. Results show that the most significant sub-criteria among 28 sub-criteria of decision making in construction project management is the experience of the manager, and the least sub-criteria is resource planning. The present study helps construction managers to enhance their knowledge and have the best performance to choose the best contractor for construction projects and improve their weaknesses by influencing factors. Also, managers can significantly enhance the success of construction projects by focusing on the most significant decision-making factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Gheibdoust & Shahram Gilaninia & Mohammad Taleghani, 2024. "Evaluating and prioritising decision-making factors in construction project management to select the best constructor," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(2), pages 185-208.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:185-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=139251
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:185-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.