IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v16y2024i1p75-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does temporal distance (still) affect the performance of virtual teams?

Author

Listed:
  • Idan Roth
  • Dov Te'eni

Abstract

Many were optimistic that virtual collaboration in distributed projects would eliminate distance and, furthermore, enable work around the clock to achieve high performance. We ask whether this optimism has held up over the past two decades, in the face of changes in technology and changes in the workplace. Using an adjusted measure of temporal distance (ATD), the paper models the perceived decision quality in a project as a function of ATD, mediated by communication richness and moderated by project analysability. The model was tested in 2009 and again in 2019 with a combined quantitative and qualitative field study. The results suggest that the relationship between ATD and perceived decision quality is nonlinear and is mediated by communication richness. In 2019, projects engaged in significantly richer communication compared with 2009, yet temporal distance still made a difference. The results did not show an interaction effect between communication richness and project analysability. We argue that despite substantial IT progress, temporal distance is not dead and should be managed.

Suggested Citation

  • Idan Roth & Dov Te'eni, 2024. "Does temporal distance (still) affect the performance of virtual teams?," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 75-101.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:75-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=136253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:75-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.