IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v15y2023i3p332-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D project evaluation at a university with knowledge acquisition and knowledge engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriella Haász
  • Katalin Czakó
  • Zoltán Baracskai

Abstract

Significant research on R&D project evaluation methods is feasible when we have clear data and conditions for measurement. In university projects, it is unwise to use directly the reference points and practices of industrial or independent labs. As a result, the method and the model introduced in this paper are adapted to find the most informative success factors for engineering R&D projects when the non-professional project manager's experience is the primary source of data. The model was developed using knowledge acquisition (KA), while 21 projects within the same domain were recorded in the knowledge base through semi-structured interviews with experienced project managers during a fine-tuning process. The contribution of this paper is the logical rules and the attributes by which we can understand the project managers' mindset in R&D projects of a higher education institutions. The paper includes an evaluation of the projects as a case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriella Haász & Katalin Czakó & Zoltán Baracskai, 2023. "R&D project evaluation at a university with knowledge acquisition and knowledge engineering," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 332-350.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:332-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=132712
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:332-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.