IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v15y2023i2p158-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tailoring project management practices for decision making: an in-depth comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Wiem Zaouga
  • Lilia Rejeb
  • Latifa Ben Arfa Rabai

Abstract

The efforts to successfully complete projects lead to the development of various project management (PM) standards, best practices and guidelines, issued by different organisational bodies. These PM practices, when appropriately implemented, lead to a better project performance. However, studies on how to adopt and adapt such practices according to management needs, remain limited. In this paper, we are going to focus on how to map the project requirements with the suitable PM practices to support the PM decision making. To respond this question, we put forward an in-depth comparative study amongst the well-established PM practices considering a set of features to pick out their challenges, limits as well as their applicability. Through this comparison, we extend the discussion of PM practices features by contrasting them to three distinct categories of requirements which are technical, contextual and behavioural. This analysis allows us to map each category to its corresponding practice(s). Our finding provides comprehensive recommendation guidelines to both practitioners and researchers in order to improve their decision making in line with the project environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Wiem Zaouga & Lilia Rejeb & Latifa Ben Arfa Rabai, 2023. "Tailoring project management practices for decision making: an in-depth comparative study," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 158-183.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:158-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=131677
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:158-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.