IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v13y2021i3p197-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of employee well-being in project work

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Bråthen
  • Margrethe Ommundsen
  • Andreas Wald
  • Maria Magdalena Aguilar Velasco

Abstract

Projects are supposed to foster innovation and flexibility and to create better conditions for learning. Accordingly, project work usually has a positive connotation for both, firms and the individual worker. However, project work can also involve stress, poor work-life balance, and burnout and thus be detrimental to employees' well-being. Well-being not only has an instrumental function for stimulating employee's motivation and work performance, but it is a fundamental human goal itself. This paper contributes to research on work-related well-being in projects by investigating the antecedents of well-being. We develop a research model based on the job-demand-support-control model which we test using a sample of Scandinavian project workers. We identify project control and co-worker support as factors enhancing the well-being of project workers and project demand as a negative factor of influence. Our findings can help organisations in creating project-work environments that support the well-being of project workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Bråthen & Margrethe Ommundsen & Andreas Wald & Maria Magdalena Aguilar Velasco, 2021. "Determinants of employee well-being in project work," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 197-217.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:197-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117949
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:197-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.