IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v13y2021i1p85-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of team commitment on client satisfaction in construction project organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Luong Hai Nguyen

Abstract

Team commitment (TC) is a significant influencing factor on the success of a construction project. Mainly, the previous works have been for more generic organisational settings, whereas none has focused on the construction project organisations (CPOs) context. Using Bayesian model averaging (BMA) technique and 195 completed construction project's data, this study reveals that contractor's commitment to project quality, client's commitment to payment, and supervisor's commitment to work contribute to improving client satisfaction with project quality. Similarly, contractor's commitment to project budget, client's commitment to payment, and supervisor's commitment to work can predict the client's satisfaction with the project budget. Additionally, contractor's commitment to project schedule and supervisor's commitment to work have a significant effect on client satisfaction with the project schedule. Additionally, contractor's commitment and supervisor's commitment are relatively significant influencing factors on all aspects of client satisfaction. The findings of this study contribute to theoretical and practical project management in order to improve construction project performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Luong Hai Nguyen, 2021. "The influence of team commitment on client satisfaction in construction project organisations," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 85-110.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:85-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=114725
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:1:p:85-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.