IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v11y2019i4p311-342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influencing factors in a portfolio of projects and operations: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • José Francisco Tebaldi De Castro
  • Helder Gomes Costa
  • Mirian Picinini Méxas
  • Cláudio Benevenuto De Campos Lima
  • Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify factors that lead to unwanted business results when present in project and operation portfolio management. As such, a systematic literature review was conducted, with selection by title, keywords, database selection, reading, content analysis, and adherence to the proposed objective. Twelve factors were consolidated, resulting from an analysis that encompassed 32 market segments in 25 countries. The originality of this study lies in the consolidation of several factors, identified in the SLR, related to four processes, in a single document. As an academic contribution, it may be as a reference for new studies on the subject. Finally, the premature identification of influencing factors in organisational processes can contribute to the deployment of actions that may or may not enhance such factors, as appropriate, giving greater robustness to the strategic decisions and the work of the teams.

Suggested Citation

  • José Francisco Tebaldi De Castro & Helder Gomes Costa & Mirian Picinini Méxas & Cláudio Benevenuto De Campos Lima & Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Caiado, 2019. "Influencing factors in a portfolio of projects and operations: a systematic review," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 311-342.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:311-342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104198
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:311-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.