IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v11y2019i2p93-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory monitoring and evaluation in development projects of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Lutfur Rahman

Abstract

This paper seeks to understand issues and challenges around the application of participatory development methods and practices in the developing world through the case study of participatory monitoring and evaluation (PM%E) in Bangladesh, while offering suggestions to overcome those challenges. Participatory development as a distinctive development paradigm holds strong potential for empowering communities at the grassroots level and promoting local ownership, which promise more sustainable development impact. However, there is growing evidence that many participatory development initiatives have failed in developing countries, largely due to the neglect of contextual specificities relating to culture, inequalities and gender discriminations. Drawing on in-depth interviews with M%E specialists in both Bangladeshi government and international development organisations, I argue that the blanket and insensitive application of PM%E has significantly reduced its effectiveness in Bangladesh where unequal power relations as well as inequalities and discrimination against women are deeply entrenched. The research has significant implications for both development scholarship and project management practice. It contributes to and enriches debates about participatory development and PM%E in the global context.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Lutfur Rahman, 2019. "Participatory monitoring and evaluation in development projects of Bangladesh," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 93-109.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:93-109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100577
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:93-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.