IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v11y2019i2p140-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the reciprocal relationship between quality of work life and subjective well-being: a path analysis model

Author

Listed:
  • Shivani Agarwal
  • Pooja Garg
  • Renu Rastogi

Abstract

The main purpose of this research paper is to study the two-way relationship between quality of work life (hereafter QWL) and subjective well-being (hereafter SWB) among IT employees. The study deploys path analysis method to generate and test a model of QWL and SWB. The model was analysed and evaluated with the help of structural equation modelling (SEM) software AMOS 20.0 version. The findings indicated that most indices of the model were desirable and the fitness of the model was proved. It was found that reciprocal relation of QWL and SWB exist. The sample size is of 350 employees which was limited to NCR (India) conducted in IT industry and it is recommended that relationship between QWL and SWB in these findings can be extended to other professionals and non-professionals employed in other industries. This study is new as there has been little recent research undertaken examining the IT sector. More generally, there is a scarcity of work on reciprocal relation of QWL and SWB. The research has developed a comprehensive model linking quality of work life and SWB.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivani Agarwal & Pooja Garg & Renu Rastogi, 2019. "Testing the reciprocal relationship between quality of work life and subjective well-being: a path analysis model," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 140-153.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:140-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=100576
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:140-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.