IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpoma/v10y2018i4p307-332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of off-site manufacturing: a meta-synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Mahnaz Ezy
  • Ehsan Saghatforoush
  • Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi

Abstract

The construction industry in most developing countries suffers from severe problems due to lack of quality in their final products. Off-site manufacturing (OSM) plays a significant role in increasing project efficiency, through transferring production processes out of the construction site. This is a useful solution tested in most industrial countries around the world. This study aims to identify and classify advantages and disadvantages of applying the OSM in the construction industry, which are extracted from in-depth literature review. For that, simultaneous application of meta synthesis approach is run to investigate both OSM advantages and disadvantages. Introducing the advantages and disadvantages of applying OSM motivates the construction industry activists to provide better opportunities for its systematic implementation. The OSM simply facilitates a safer construction site and faster construction process. The final frameworks of advantages and disadvantages concluded in this study clarify the need for implementation of such a newly presented technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahnaz Ezy & Ehsan Saghatforoush & Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi, 2018. "An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of off-site manufacturing: a meta-synthesis," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 307-332.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:307-332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95272
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:10:y:2018:i:4:p:307-332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=96 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.