IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v20y2025i1p96-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared service centre organisations and quantitative evidence on a reduction in administration costs: an umbrella review

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Goth
  • Daniel Catala-Perez
  • Barbara Hedderich

Abstract

Over the last four decades, the shared service centres idea has emerged as a predominant solution to reorganise the support processes of companies worldwide. A stream of academic literature emphasises their potential for ambitious cost savings, shaping the impression that the 'holy grail' for managing companies' administrative costs has been found. However, quantitative evidence based on publicly available financial data is scarce. With the assistance of an umbrella review, this article aims for a structured evaluation of secondary and tertiary SSC literature in that regard. The analysis of 22 publications confirmed initial perceptions. Quantitative data evaluating the impact of SSC organisations on firms administrative cost structure are absent. Furthermore, heterogeneous research procedures yield diverse outputs, deviating from established standards for structured literature reviews. The gathered results substantiate the need for additional investigations at the primary research level, to finalise evidence search and devise a research agenda to address identified gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Goth & Daniel Catala-Perez & Barbara Hedderich, 2025. "Shared service centre organisations and quantitative evidence on a reduction in administration costs: an umbrella review," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(1), pages 96-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:96-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145493
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:20:y:2025:i:1:p:96-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.