IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v18y2024i3p352-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the determinants of FinTech adoption intention: the moderating role of customer advocacy

Author

Listed:
  • D. Yuvaraj
  • Pulidindi Venugopal
  • Shaply Abdul Kareem
  • S. Aswinipriya

Abstract

FinTech is transforming the way financial transactions are dealt with, particularly payments, purchases, and investment services. The purpose of this research is to explore the determinants of FinTech adoption intentions. Additionally, the moderating role of customer advocacy (CAD) between the determinants and adoption intention was also examined. The technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) are theoretical models used in this study. Purposive sampling was applied to collect data from 688 respondents. The data is analysed using PLS-SEM and IPMA. Perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), task technology fit (TTF), and trust (TRU) influence FinTech adoption intentions. Finally, customer advocacy moderates task technology fit, trust, and FinTech adoption intention. Trust is the most important predictor, whereas PEOU, TTF, and CAD are the best-performing variables for FinTech adoption intention, based on IPMA. This study contributes to the understanding of FinTech for users, service providers, and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Yuvaraj & Pulidindi Venugopal & Shaply Abdul Kareem & S. Aswinipriya, 2024. "Examining the determinants of FinTech adoption intention: the moderating role of customer advocacy," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 352-370.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:352-370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=142144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:18:y:2024:i:3:p:352-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.