IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v8y2015i6p666-687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The key enablers for the adoption of lean thinking by public purchasing departments

Author

Listed:
  • James K. Agbodzakey
  • Clifford P. McCue

Abstract

The complex and multifaceted nature of public procurement to some extent negate efficiency and effectiveness in serving the public purpose. The mandate to deliver different types of services to various segments of society and the need to do more with less resources place responsibility on public purchasing departments to be innovative. Lean thinking thereby offers viable opportunities for value creation through intentional strategies, techniques and tools to enhance process, product and outcomes. However, the decision to adopt lean thinking is contingent on multiple variables. This study attempts to identify key enablers for the adoption of the lean approach in the public sector. The study relies on data garnered from various public purchasing departments in North America. Multivariate analysis of the evidence suggests strategic, management, and individual level factors are essential for the adoption of the lean approach. The onus now rests on various professionals and relevant stakeholders associated with public procurement to initiate measures that will facilitate adoption of lean thinking as a conduit to responsive management and beneficial outcomes for society.

Suggested Citation

  • James K. Agbodzakey & Clifford P. McCue, 2015. "The key enablers for the adoption of lean thinking by public purchasing departments," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(6), pages 666-687.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:666-687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=72386
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:666-687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.