IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v4y2011i6p627-641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differential method for TCO modelling: an analysis and tutorial

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Hanson

Abstract

Cost models based on total cost of ownership (TCO) or life cycle cost (LCC) are widely advocated for procurement decisions, particularly those involving source selection or to make outsourcing decisions. Unfortunately, the standard treatments of these topics in textbooks and journal articles provide little guidance on how to actually set up and perform the analyses, in part because they tend to overlook the differential nature of these concepts. This article demonstrates that a TCO is not a property of a product or service but of a decision and thus lends itself to differential analysis. A template structure is proposed to assist in performing the analysis and presenting the results. The key benefits of this structure are: a) more rigorously analysed decisions; b) a communication tool by which the impact of procurement decisions can be communicated to the larger organisation and integrated into strategic planning discussions.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Hanson, 2011. "Differential method for TCO modelling: an analysis and tutorial," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 627-641.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:627-641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arne Jeppe & Heike Proff & Max Eickhoff, 2023. "Economic Potentials of Ecologically Attractive Multi-Life Products—The Example of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:627-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.