IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v10y2017i2p150-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling coopetition in aircraft spare part supply chain: game-theoretic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohita Gangwar Sharma
  • Kashi N. Singh

Abstract

Owing to constant pressure on the bottom line, companies have been forced to adopt a new relationship called 'coopetition', which is a combination of both 'cooperation' and 'competition'. Functionally, in supply chain this concept has been understood in a dyadic relationship and network relationship. This study considers specifically a coopetitive arrangement between two or more airlines for spares supply. In coopetition, players forge different types of coalitions as they share resources. In this paper, we model the possible coalitions in the aircraft spares supply scenario and examine stable outcomes using the concept of core in cooperative game theory. Shapley value can be one way of utilising and sustaining the potential of this concept. The managerial implication includes this discipline forming the basis of contracting and negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohita Gangwar Sharma & Kashi N. Singh, 2017. "Modelling coopetition in aircraft spare part supply chain: game-theoretic approach," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 150-162.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:150-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=82784
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohita Gangwar Sharma & K. N. Singh, 2017. "Servitization, Coopetition, and Sustainability: An Operations Perspective in Aviation Industry," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 42(3), pages 145-152, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:10:y:2017:i:2:p:150-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.