IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v5y2014i1p6-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hobbes, Seabright, and our ancestors: institutionalist theory and the writing of evolutionary history

Author

Listed:
  • John F. Henry

Abstract

Recently, a debate has ensued as to whether neoclassical economics has jettisoned its inward looking, reductionism of the past in favour of a more open evolutionary style, making it more compatible with institutional economics. Paul Seabright's, The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life claims to do precisely this and thus it is worthwhile to critically assess its efforts. Does it really represent a fundamental change or it is merely window dressing, serving up the same neoclassical analysis in slightly different form? This paper evaluates Seabright's claim from largely an (old) institutionalist perspective and finds that fundamentally The Company of Strangers fits quite comfortably within the confines of traditional neoclassicism; thus, no 'bridge' has been established which would allow a more fruitful interchange with 'old' institutionalism.

Suggested Citation

  • John F. Henry, 2014. "Hobbes, Seabright, and our ancestors: institutionalist theory and the writing of evolutionary history," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1), pages 6-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:6-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=62353
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:6-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.