IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijplur/v2y2011i2p181-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experience and pluralist pedagogy: service learning as a means and an end

Author

Listed:
  • Erik K. Olsen

Abstract

Economics teaching relies overwhelmingly on faculty lecturing, which is generally seen as a significant pedagogical problem. But this paper argues that didactic instruction is actually well-suited to the neoclassical economics that is usually taught. This approach – especially its textbook version – is typically sceptical of individual perception and inductive reasoning, relying instead on parsimonious models and deduction. Experiential learning has very limited usefulness in learning such theories. In contrast, heterodox approaches in economics typically employ both inductive and deductive reasoning. Since induction is integral to experiential learning, a pluralist curriculum offers important pedagogical advantages. Service learning exposes students to economic phenomena in their communities and challenges them to learn from that experience. This can call the instrumentalism of the textbook neoclassical approach into question and open up the classroom discussion to alternative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik K. Olsen, 2011. "Experience and pluralist pedagogy: service learning as a means and an end," International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 181-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:181-195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41698
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Löw Beer & Verena Holz, 2021. "Education for Sustainable Development in Structural Change Processes Using the Example of the Coal Phase-out in Lusatia," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 15(1), pages 100-121, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijplur:v:2:y:2011:i:2:p:181-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=319 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.