IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v9y2009i4p406-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature creep and usability in consumer electronic product design

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Page

Abstract

This research considers the existing literature discussing the usability of microelectronic products and reports on the research undertaken by the author in identifying the consumer perception of contemporary and legacy electronic products. The effect of microelectronic advancement on product usability is investigated and analysed in combination with case-based investigation into consumer attitudes towards product purchase and the usability of digital cameras. Research was conducted through a structured questionnaire, focus groups and interviews. The findings suggest that users see benefits in microelectronics, such as useful functionalities and improvements in size, weight and general versatility, but also found the increased complexity and reduced reliability of electronic products as detrimental to usability. Non-electronic products were identified as largely simpler and more intuitive and, therefore, more usable. Ultimately, users demanded high functionality and usability, an amalgamation largely achieved by digital cameras through the use of well-designed and intuitive interfaces and menu systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Page, 2009. "Feature creep and usability in consumer electronic product design," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 406-428.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:9:y:2009:i:4:p:406-428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=27474
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:9:y:2009:i:4:p:406-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.